Marcus Aurelius: The Emperor Who Wrote to Himself
The most powerful man in the world sat down at night and wrote notes to himself.
Not to be published, not to be read, not to instruct anyone or build a reputation or leave a legacy.
Just notes. Reminders. Rebukes. The private record of a man trying, every single day, to be better than he was.
Marcus Aurelius was Emperor of Rome from 161 to 180 CE. He commanded the largest army in the world. He governed perhaps fifty million people. He fought wars on the Danube for most of his reign, standing in mud and snow at the edge of empire while plague devastated his troops and his adopted family betrayed him.
And at night, in the tent or the palace, he wrote things like this:
“If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your estimate of it. And this you have the power to revoke at any moment.”
“The impediment to action advances action. What stands in the way becomes the way.”
“Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.”
He was writing to himself. He was failing, often, to live what he wrote. He kept writing anyway.
I. The Accident of History
The Meditations should not exist.
Marcus never intended them for publication. They are written in the second person, you, as self-address, self-command, self-rebuke. “You have done this wrong. Do not do it again. This is what you must remember. Do not forget.”
They were probably written in the last decade of his life, during the Marcomannic Wars on the northern frontier, in moments between military command and administrative duty.
They survived by accident. A manuscript tradition that is poorly understood, copied by monks who perhaps did not fully grasp what they were preserving: a Roman emperor’s private notebook, not his public philosophy.
We do not know their original title. Meditations is a later editorial invention. The Greek manuscripts call them Ta eis heauton, Things to Oneself.
That is the right title. These are things written to oneself. The most intimate philosophical document from the ancient world.
II. The Man Behind the Emperor
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus was born in 121 CE to a wealthy Spanish-Roman family.
He was adopted by the Emperor Antoninus Pius, himself adopted by Hadrian, as part of a carefully engineered succession. He did not want to be emperor. He wanted to be a philosopher.
At twelve, he encountered Stoicism and was, by his own account, transformed. He slept on the ground. He wore rough clothing. He studied with the Stoic teacher Epictetus, or rather with the writings of Epictetus, whom he never met. Epictetus had died around 135 CE, when Marcus was still a boy, and the Discourses reached him later through his teacher Junius Rusticus.
Epictetus had been a slave. Marcus would become an emperor. Both were, in their different ways, unfree: Epictetus in body, Marcus in obligation. Both found in Stoicism the same answer: freedom is not the absence of constraint. Freedom is the right relationship to constraint.
When Antoninus Pius died in 161 CE, Marcus became emperor.
He immediately appointed his adoptive brother Lucius Verus as co-emperor, an act of unusual generosity and political wisdom. He did not want sole power. He had never wanted power at all.
He spent most of his reign doing what he least wanted to do, commanding armies, administering justice, managing the endless machinery of empire, and writing at night about why this was necessary and how to bear it without becoming what it could make you.
III. The Stoic Framework, Lived
The Meditations are not a systematic philosophy. They are Stoic philosophy applied, imperfectly, repeatedly, urgently, to the specific pressures of Marcus’s life.
The central Stoic framework appears again and again, in slightly different formulations, as if Marcus needed to remind himself of the same truths over and over:
The dichotomy of control:
“Of things, some are in our power and some are not. In our power are opinion, motivation, desire, aversion, in a word, whatever is of our own doing. Not in our power are our body, our reputation, office, and in a word, whatever is not of our own doing.”
This is Epictetus. Marcus returns to it constantly, because he constantly forgets it, or fails to live it, or finds it insufficient under pressure.
The present moment:
“Confine yourself to the present.”
“Do not disturb yourself by thinking of the whole of your life. Let not your thoughts range over the many and varied troubles which have come to you in the past and will come again in the future, but ask yourself with regard to every present difficulty: ‘What is there in this that is intolerable and beyond endurance?’”
Marcus is not a natural present-moment person. He worries. He ruminates. He rehearses disasters. He writes instructions to himself to stop, which means he has not stopped.
This is what makes the Meditations human. He is not reporting his achievements. He is recording his aspirations and his failures to meet them.
The view from above:
One of Marcus’s recurring techniques, which he may have learned from Epictetus, is the view from above: the deliberate imaginative act of seeing your life from a great height, or across a long span of time.
“Look at the past, empire succeeding empire, and from that, extrapolate the future. Nothing but the same things. You can’t escape this rhythm of history.”
“Observe constantly that all things take place by change, and accustom yourself to consider that the nature of the Universe loves nothing so much as to change the things which are, and to make new things like them.”
Everything passes. Everything is temporary. The empire you govern will be ruins. Your name will be forgotten. Your decisions, agonized over, argued about, the ones that kept you awake, will be dust.
This is not nihilism. It is the therapeutic use of impermanence, the Stoic practice of holding the long view to dissolve the urgency of the immediate.
If it will not matter in a thousand years, why let it consume you now?
IV. What He Was Fighting
Marcus does not name his enemies in the Meditations. But they are visible between the lines.
Anger.
He returns to anger again and again, the anger of a powerful man who is constantly frustrated, constantly disappointed, constantly surrounded by people who are lesser than what the situation demands.
“When you wake up in the morning, tell yourself: the people I deal with today will be meddling, ungrateful, arrogant, dishonest, jealous and surly.”
This is not misanthropy. It is preparation, the Stoic practice of premeditatio malorum, the premeditation of evils. Expect the worst. Be grateful when it doesn’t arrive. When it does arrive, you are ready.
“The best revenge is not to be like your enemy.”
He writes this because he is tempted to be like his enemies. He is emperor. He could simply destroy them. He writes this to himself because he knows that destroying them would destroy something in him.
Distraction.
“People look for retreats for themselves, in the country, at the sea, in the hills. But this is altogether a sign of the most common sort of man, for it is in your power whenever you choose to retire into yourself.”
He has no retreat. He is always watched, always needed, always on. The retreat must be internal, the philosophical practice of withdrawing into the self that is truly one’s own.
The corruption of power.
This is perhaps the most remarkable thing about the Meditations: the explicit, repeated anxiety about what power does to people.
“Take care that you are not made into a Caesar, that you are not dyed with this dye, for such things happen. Keep yourself then simple, good, pure, serious, free from affectation, a friend of justice, a worshipper of the gods, kind, affectionate, strenuous in all proper acts.”
“Take care that you are not made into a Caesar.”
He is Caesar. He is the emperor. And he is warning himself against becoming what he already is.
Not a warning against the title, but against the transformation of character that the title produces: the habit of being obeyed, the assumption of one’s own importance, the insulation from honest feedback, the slow corruption of judgment by the deference of everyone around you.
He saw this happening. He wrote against it, to himself, alone, at night.
Whether the writing helped, whether he succeeded in not becoming a Caesar, history does not give us a clear answer. By most accounts, he governed well. By some accounts, he failed his son Commodus, allowing him to succeed despite knowing his character, and the result was catastrophic.
He was not perfect. He was trying.
V. On Death
Death is everywhere in the Meditations.
Not because Marcus was morbid, but because the Stoics believed that the correct relationship to death was the foundation of everything else.
“Think of yourself as dead. You have lived your life. Now take what’s left and live it properly.”
“Not to live as if you had endless years ahead of you. Death overshadows you. While you’re alive and able, be good.”
He watched people die constantly. Plague swept through his armies, his children died young, colleagues and friends disappeared. Death was not an abstraction for him.
He used it as a clarifying lens:
“Ask yourself at every moment, ‘Is this necessary?’”
If you are going to die, if everyone you know is going to die, if the empire itself will eventually be ruins, then the question of what is necessary becomes sharp and urgent.
Most of what we do is not necessary. Most of what we worry about, and most of what we want, is not necessary either.
What remains, when the unnecessary is stripped away?
Marcus’s answer: virtue. The present moment. The people in front of you. The work at hand. The attempt, however imperfect, to be good.
VI. The Philosopher King
Plato dreamed of the philosopher-king, the ruler who had seen the Form of the Good and governed in its light.
Marcus Aurelius is the closest history came to making this dream real.
He was a genuine philosopher, not a dilettante who read a few books but a man who had studied Stoicism for decades, who knew the tradition deeply, who took the philosophical life seriously as a practice rather than a performance.
And he was the most powerful ruler in the world.
The result was not Plato’s ideal.
It was something more complicated and more interesting: a man who knew what he should be and struggled, daily, to be it. A man who had more power than any human being should have and used it, mostly, well. A man who wrote at night about the gap between the ideal and the real, never closed the gap, and never stopped trying.
“You could leave life right now. Let that determine what you do and say and think.”
He did not leave life right now. He stayed. He governed. He wrote. He tried.
This is the philosopher-king as he actually exists. Not the serene master of the Form of the Good, but the tired man in the tent at the edge of empire, writing notes to himself by lamplight, reminding himself of what he already knows and keeps forgetting.
VII. What the Meditations Give Us
The Meditations are unlike any other philosophical text because they make no argument.
They do not try to persuade. They do not address an audience. They are not arranged for effect.
They are a man thinking, returning to the same ideas, finding slightly different formulations, testing the same principles against the specific difficulties of a specific day.
What they give us:
Permission to struggle.
Marcus was the most powerful man in the world, a devoted student of philosophy for fifty years, and he still had to remind himself, every single day, of the same basic truths.
He was still angry. Still distracted. Still afraid. Still failing to live what he knew.
If Marcus Aurelius needed daily reminders, then perhaps the philosophical life is not the achievement of a stable state but the practice of returning, again and again, to what matters.
The journal as philosophical practice.
The Meditations are, before anything else, a journal. Not a diary of events, Marcus records almost nothing that happened, but a journal of attention: where the mind went, what it found there, what it needed to be told.
The act of writing to oneself, the articulation of what you believe in the privacy of your own thought, is itself a philosophical practice. It is the examined life, practiced daily.
The ordinary life as philosophical site.
Marcus did not retire to a garden, like Epicurus. He did not die in prison, like Socrates. He ruled an empire, fought wars, managed ungrateful subordinates, attended endless administrative meetings, and found philosophy not in retreat from this but in the middle of it.
The Meditations are a record of philosophy practiced under conditions of maximum distraction, and therefore one of the most honest accounts of what philosophy actually requires.
Not the absence of difficulty. The transformation of difficulty into practice.
VIII. The Last Entry
We do not know which entry in the Meditations was last. The text is not dated.
But there is a quality to certain passages, a tiredness, a finality, a sense of summing up, that feels like late writing.
“Loss is nothing else but change, and change is Nature’s delight.”
“Accept the things to which fate binds you, and love the people with whom fate brings you together, and do so with all your heart.”
“The first rule is to keep an untroubled spirit. The second is to look things in the face and know them for what they are.”
Marcus died in 180 CE, at a military camp on the Danube, of what was probably the Antonine Plague.
He was fifty-eight years old.
By tradition, his last words, to the officer of the watch who came to ask for the password for the night, were these:
“Go to the rising sun; I am already setting.”
He had been setting for years. He had written about setting, about death, impermanence, the passage of all things, for as long as we have his writing.
When it came, he met it as he had tried to meet everything: with clarity, without pretense, and with the kind of dry wit that only a man who has fully accepted something can bring to it.
Go to the rising sun. I am already setting.
Read the Meditations in Gregory Hays’s translation, published by the Modern Library in 2002. It is the best translation in English: alive, clear, and not afraid of Marcus’s roughness.
Read it slowly, a few entries at a time.
Read it when you’re struggling, or when you’re about to do something you know is wrong.
Read it at night, alone, when the day has been difficult.
That is how it was written.
That is how it should be read.
Enjoy Reading This Article?
Here are some more articles you might like to read next: