Chingiz Aitmatov — The Writer Who Carried a Whole World on His Back
There is a writer most Western readers have never heard of.
He was born in 1928 in a small village in Kyrgyzstan, so remote that the nearest railway station was a day’s journey away. He wrote in both Kyrgyz and Russian. He was translated into more than 170 languages. He sold hundreds of millions of copies.
In the Soviet Union he was the most widely read living author. Gabriel García Márquez called him one of the greatest writers of the century. Mikhail Gorbachev counted him a personal friend and advisor.
His name was Chingiz Aitmatov.
I should say up front that I can’t write about him from a distance. I was raised by my grandmother, the way the children in his books so often are. His novels are tangled up with the most important person in my life, and with losing her. So this isn’t a neutral recommendation. It’s closer to a confession.
If you haven’t read him, there is a gift waiting for you. Let me try to tell you why.
I. The World He Came From
To read Aitmatov without knowing where he came from is to read him with one eye closed.
Kyrgyzstan, the land between the Tian Shan mountains and the vast steppes of Central Asia, is one of the oldest inhabited places on earth and one of the least known to Western readers.
The Kyrgyz were nomads for millennia, their culture built around movement, horses, the sky, the relationship between the human and the elemental. Their oral tradition, the Epic of Manas, is the longest epic poem in any language, three times the length of the Odyssey and the Iliad combined, and it carried the memory of the people across centuries of conquest.
Then came the Russians. Then the Soviets.
Collectivization destroyed the nomadic way of life. The great Manaschi, the epic singers who had memorized hundreds of thousands of verses, were branded class enemies. The old language, the old stories, the old bond with the land, all of it was being taken apart on purpose.
Aitmatov grew up in the ruins of that dismantling. His father, Törökul Aitmatov, a Communist Party official and intellectual, was arrested in 1937 during Stalin’s purges and shot the following year. Chingiz was nine.
His mother raised four children alone, in a village with almost no men left, all of them taken by the purges or the war. At fourteen, Aitmatov was the village tax collector. At fifteen, secretary of the village council. He carried the weight of adults before he had finished being a child.
This isn’t background. It’s the source of everything he wrote: knowing what it means to lose a father to the state, to watch a culture erased, to carry too much too soon, to love a landscape while it is being destroyed.
II. The White Ship (Белый пароход, 1970)
There is a boy.
He is seven, maybe eight. He lives with his grandfather Momun at a remote forest ranger’s post in the mountains of Kyrgyzstan. His parents are gone, separated, absent, unreachable. He has a school bag, and he treasures it.
He has three friends: a pair of binoculars he uses to watch the distant world, a stone shaped like a fish, and a white ship he can see far away on the Issik lake below. He has invented a game. He will turn into a fish, swim down the river to the lake, find the white ship, and tell his father, who he believes is on that ship, everything that has happened.
I have to stop here, because this is where the book stopped being a book for me and became a mirror.
I was raised by my grandmother, the way this boy is raised by his grandfather. I learned my töreler, my customs, the old right and wrong of things, from her, exactly the way Momun teaches the boy. And I had a game almost identical to his. I grew up in a house on the Aegean. The whole sea opened up from our balcony, and I spent my entire childhood watching the ships go by. I used to tell myself: if I can count more than ten ships before they pass, my wish will come true (I do not remember my wishes!). The boy had his white ship on the Issik lake. I had the Aegean, the sea I fell in love with as a child. It was my white ship.
And the school bag. The boy’s whole heart is in that bag. When I was six I got my first one, green, with the Lion King on it, and I fell so completely in love with it that I wanted school to start immediately just so I could carry it. I have never forgotten that feeling, and Aitmatov had already found it and put it in a book before I was even born.
So, the boy. He lives in two worlds at once. The forest post, with its adult cruelties and small corruptions, and the world of myth: the world of the Horned Mother Deer, who in Kyrgyz legend brought the ancestors of the Kyrgyz back to life after enemies had wiped them out. She is the spirit of the forest, the principle of regeneration, the promise that destruction is not the last word. Momun tells the boy this story, and the boy believes it, not naively, but with a child’s full capacity for mythic truth.
Then Orozkul, the boy’s uncle by marriage, the brutal, drunk, resentful man who runs the post, kills a deer. Not just a deer. The last deer in the forest, against every prohibition the grandfather has ever taught. And Momun, gentle, frightened, compromised, helps him do it.
The boy watches his grandfather butcher the deer. The man who gave him the myth helps destroy it.
There is no rescue. No Horned Mother Deer returning. The boy walks into the river.
“I won’t return,” he said to himself. “It’s better to be a fish, it’s better to be a fish.”
When I first read that, I didn’t read it as despair. I said to the boy, almost out loud: you’re free now. Because life is like that. Some people’s burden is unbearably heavy while they are still children, and this is the novel of a child who answers his disappointment by drowning himself in his own dream.
What it does
Aitmatov said he agonized over that ending. His editors wanted him to change it, to give the boy a rescue, a hope, a Soviet future. Soviet literature was supposed to end in forward motion, in the promise of the new Soviet man. He refused.
The ending isn’t a celebration of death. It’s a statement about what happens when the sources of meaning, the myth, the story, the grandfather’s love, are corrupted from the inside. The boy doesn’t die because the world is cruel. He dies because the person who gave him the myth helped kill it. That is the precise, unbearable betrayal at the center of the book: not the cruelty of enemies, but the weakness of love. Momun loves the boy. Momun is also weak. Both are true at once, and it is their being true at once that breaks everything.
This book has no good guys and bad guys. It has innocence, and just as much pain. It has the world of one small child, which may be more meaningful than all of ours. And the characters are so sincere, so alive, so much like us. Which of us hasn’t flared up like Orozkul? Which of us hasn’t railed against fate like Aunt Bekey? Which of us hasn’t begged forgiveness like Grandfather Momun? And which of us, head to toe in innocence, hasn’t waited for our own white ship?
The one I keep arguing with is Momun. Half the book I wanted to shake him. Raise your voice, old man. Rebel. Break the chains. And the maddening thing is that the one or two times he does raise it, even slightly, both Orozkul and the grandmother flinch and back off. But it never lasts. Isn’t that exactly how it goes? You work yourself to the bone, you stay quiet, you try to make yourself useful to people, and as long as you never raise your voice you get crushed, looked down on, never paid back for what you gave. Sometimes you have to raise it. Sometimes you have to act for what you believe, or you end up like Momun, destroying the thing you love with your own hands.
There is a line in it I underlined: the one who wants to cover his own shame smears it on the faces of others. That is Orozkul exactly.
The book is short, a novella really. You can read it in an afternoon. It will stay with you for decades.
III. The Day Lasts More Than a Hundred Years (И дольше века длится день, 1980)
This is his masterpiece. It is, and I’ll say it without hedging, one of the great novels of the twentieth century, and one of the least known in the West.
The title comes from a Pasternak poem, Unique Days (Единственные дни). The line is И дольше века длится день, “and the day lasts longer than a century.” The novel’s Russian title is essentially that line: The Day Lasts Longer Than a Century.
It is also my grief book. I started it while my grandmother was still alive and finished it after she was gone. By the time I read the last page, the person who raised me, the person who gave me my töreler the way Momun gave them to that boy, was no longer in the world. I cannot separate this novel from that. For a while I would fall into certain sentences and stay there for hours.
The book takes place over a single day and night: the day Yedigei Zhangel’din, a worker at a small railway junction in the Kazakh steppe, has to bury his lifelong friend Kazangap. But the single day holds a whole century. Yedigei’s journey to the burial ground, across the flat enormous steppe on a camel named Karanar, opens out into memory: his whole life, his friendship with Kazangap, the history of the junction, of the steppe, of the Kazakh people.
Yedigei has lived here for decades. He arrived after the war, stayed, raised children, buried friends, watched the world change while the steppe stayed exactly where it was. He is not a hero in any conventional sense. He is a man of the steppe: patient, sturdy, with a memory that holds everything and a grief that cannot be said quickly.
The junction is called Boranly-Burannyi, the Windy Place, the Place of Blizzards. Trains pass through it east to west and west to east, carrying everyone and everything, connecting and separating in the same motion.
“Trains in these parts went from East to West, and from West to East… On either side of the railway lines lay the great wide spaces of the desert - Sary-Ozeki, the Middle lands of the yellow steppes. In these parts any distance was measured in relation to the railway, as if from the Greenwich meridian… And the trains went from East to West, and from West to East…”
This is the passage I lost myself in. It looks like nothing. It is one of the most resonant openings in modern literature: the steppe as crossroads, the junction as the point where all directions meet and none of them is home. I read it over and over in the weeks I was grieving, the trains going and coming, going and coming, while one particular person stayed gone.
Another line I underlined, and I no longer remember exactly what undid me in that moment, but I marked it hard: terrible things can happen to people too. A person left alone with contradictions he cannot overcome is shaken to the depths, and he can tell no one, because no one can help him. It is like a terrible landslide. You see the danger, and you can do nothing.
The Mankurt
Woven through the novel is the legend of the Mankurt.
In Aitmatov’s retelling of the old Zhuan legend, enemy warriors who took prisoners would sometimes perform a procedure to destroy a captive’s memory, to make him forget his name, his family, his language, his self. They shaved his head, wrapped it in raw camel hide, and left him in the desert sun. As the hide dried it shrank and tightened, causing unbearable pain. Some it killed. Some it drove mad. The ones who survived came out as Mankurts: human bodies with no memory of ever having been human. Perfect slaves. Obedient, tireless, with no will and no history.
They couldn’t be freed, because they didn’t know they were enslaved. They had no self to free.
In the legend, a Mankurt kills his own mother when she comes to rescue him, because he doesn’t recognize her, because the word mother means nothing to him, because being a son requires a self that can stand in relation to a mother, and his is gone.
Aitmatov wrote this in 1980, at the height of a Soviet cultural policy that was systematically erasing minority languages and histories. The Mankurt is not really a metaphor. It’s a description. A people made to forget their language is being Mankurtized. A culture whose epics are filed away as dangerous is being Mankurtized. A child taught that her grandparents’ world was backward and primitive is being Mankurtized.
The mother in the legend, Naiman-Ana, rides out calling her son’s name. He doesn’t know her. He kills her. Her white headscarf, lifting into the air as she falls, becomes a white bird that flies over the steppe forever, calling: remember whose child you are, remember your name.
That image gets into you and never leaves. And I think I understand now why it lodged so deep. Everything I am that is worth keeping, my language, my customs, the small old rules of how to be a person, came from my grandmother. To forget her would be to be Mankurtized. So I don’t. The bird is still calling, and I am still answering.
The science fiction frame
The novel’s second strand is extraordinary, and largely unknown even to people who have read the book, because it was cut from many editions.
While Yedigei crosses the steppe, two cosmonauts, one Soviet and one American, aboard a joint space station, make contact with an alien civilization: Lesnaya Grud, the Forest Breast, a planet of beings of remarkable intelligence and goodwill. The cosmic beings want to make contact with Earth. The Soviet and American governments, terrified of what that contact might reveal or disrupt or give to their own citizens, refuse. They build Parity, a joint barrier around the Earth to keep any contact out. The cosmonauts, unable to obey the order to cut off the civilization that has opened itself to them, are stranded, unable to come home and unable to go on.
The parallel isn’t subtle, and it isn’t meant to be. The steppe and the cosmos, the burial and the barrier, the forgetting of the Mankurt and the refusal of contact, are all the same story. The story of power choosing ignorance over knowledge, isolation over connection, control over the frightening freedom of knowing more than you knew before.
IV. The Scaffold (Плаха, 1986)
In Turkish it’s published as Dişi Kurdun Rüyaları, “The Dreams of the She-Wolf,” and honestly that title is the truer one, because the wolves are the soul of the book, and I notice I left their dreams out the first time I tried to write about it.
By 1986 Aitmatov was writing differently. The Scaffold is his most ambitious and most uneven novel, a book that reaches for everything and doesn’t entirely hold together, but whose best moments are among the greatest things he wrote.
It opens, magnificently, with wolves. Akbara and Tashchainar, a she-wolf and her mate, on the Central Asian steppe. The wolves aren’t symbols. They are wolves, specific and particular, with their own perceptions and fears and desires, and Aitmatov gives us their inner life, and the she-wolf’s dreams, with a directness that is genuinely astonishing.
The wolves are hunting, raising cubs. Then the Soviet narcotics operation arrives to harvest the wild marijuana growing on the steppe. Helicopters, men with guns, chaos. The antelope herd stampedes and is slaughtered. The cubs are killed. Akbara and Tashchainar survive, and lose litter after litter to human activity, not to cruelty exactly, but to indifference. The people don’t hate the wolves. The wolves simply do not exist inside the frame of what matters to the people making the decisions.
That is the moral argument running under the whole book: not that people are evil, but that the circle of what counts has been drawn too small, and a world where wolves and their cubs don’t count is a world where eventually nothing will.
I underlined one question in it that I still don’t have an answer to: why does evil, almost every single time, come out stronger than good?
Alongside the wolves there is a human story: a young man searching for God in the Soviet steppe, a drug addict, a Christ figure, a party official.
The novel isn’t perfectly built. It’s too long, too various, too ambitious. But the wolves are perfect. And the image of Akbara, having lost everything, finally taking a human child, not out of malice but out of a grief with nowhere else to go, will not leave you.
V. The Place That Connects Two Worlds
All of Aitmatov’s novels share a geography, not a literal one but a mythic one.
A vast open landscape, steppe or mountain or lake, in which the human figure is small against enormous forces: time, history, the state, the cosmos. A railway or a river or a white ship in the distance, the possibility of elsewhere. A story inside the story, a myth or a legend or a song, holding the truth the present can’t hold directly. And a moment of loss that is somehow also, in a way that is not consolation but is not the opposite of consolation either, a moment of clarity.
Aitmatov understood something about loss that most writers flinch from: that some losses are not healed, not transformed, not made meaningful. They are simply real.
The white ship does not return. The Mankurt does not remember. Akbara does not stop grieving.
But the telling, the fact that someone sat down and found the exact words for these irreversible things, is its own kind of answer. Not to the loss. To the silence the loss leaves behind. I know that silence. This is the writer who filled it for me.
VI. Language and Double Vision
Aitmatov wrote in two languages, Kyrgyz and Russian, and the bilingualism was not incidental. It gave him a kind of double vision, the ability to live in two cultural worlds at once, to see each through the other, and to find in the gap between them the space where literature happens.
His Kyrgyz gave him the oral tradition, the epic cadences, the particular bond between the human and the natural, the way time moves in a nomadic culture, not in a straight chronological line but in layers, the past still present in the present in a way literate cultures tend to suppress.
His Russian gave him the great tradition of the Russian novel, a literary language honed by Pushkin and Tolstoy and Dostoevsky and Chekhov, two centuries of forms built for thinking about suffering and meaning.
The result is a prose unlike anyone else’s, vast and intimate at the same time, moving between myth and the texture of an ordinary day with a naturalness that feels inevitable afterward and is, in practice, extraordinarily hard to do.
People sometimes reach for “magical realism.” It isn’t quite right. García Márquez’s magic comes from excess, the world overfull with impossible things. Aitmatov’s myth comes from depth: the world exactly as it is, but seen through a longer time, a deeper history, a different relationship to the sacred. The Horned Mother Deer doesn’t break the laws of nature. She is the law of nature, seen from inside a tradition that never split the human off from the natural in the first place.
VII. What He Knew
Aitmatov died in 2008, in Nuremberg, of pneumonia. He was seventy-nine. He had outlived the Soviet Union, served as Kyrgyzstan’s ambassador to several countries, and watched his country become independent and then struggle to work out what independence even meant after centuries of being someone else’s territory.
What his books say to me, over and over, is not that grief will be healed, or that it has a hidden meaning, or that it will pass. It is something quieter and harder and, in the end, more bearable: that the steppe is wide enough to hold it. The landscape, vast and indifferent and enduring, receives what the human can’t contain. The wind takes it. The grass absorbs it. The white bird keeps flying overhead, calling a name that someone, somewhere, still remembers.
And then there is the line I carry around with me, the one that I think actually made me who I am. He wrote, simply:
“Yes, there will be winter, there will be cold, there will be snowstorms. But then there will be spring again.”
I read that as a younger person and never put it down. It is the whole of him in one sentence. The winter is real. He never once pretends it isn’t. And the spring is real too.
VIII. Where to Begin
If you haven’t read Aitmatov, begin with The White Ship. It is the shortest, the purest, the most devastating, and it will tell you almost immediately whether his world is your world. For most people who meet it, the answer is yes, an almost embarrassing, total yes, as if the book had been waiting for them in a language they didn’t know they spoke. It was for me.
Then The Day Lasts More Than a Hundred Years. Read it slowly. Let Yedigei’s journey take its time. Let the steppe do what the steppe does.
Then The Scaffold, knowing its flaws, reading past them for the wolves and their dreams.
Then Farewell, Gulsary, the story of a man and his horse, which is to say a story about loyalty and about growing old in a world that is growing old in a different direction than you are. And if it takes hold of you the way it took hold of me, go on to Jamila and Mother Earth, and then you will simply have read all of him, which is one of the better things that can happen to a person.
When you’ve read them all, sit for a while with the image of a white bird over the steppe, a headscarf, a mother’s voice, calling a name that must not be forgotten.
Remember whose child you are. Remember your name.
One last thing, and it is the truest one.
I am Turkish, and the Kyrgyz are my kin. Our languages are close enough that we can sit across from one another and understand each other, the way cousins do without even trying. The Horned Mother Deer is not only a Kyrgyz saint. She is holy to all the Turkic peoples, the same sacred mother under different names across the same enormous map. When Aitmatov tells these stories, he is not reporting on a distant culture for outsiders. He is telling mine.
So he is not really, for me, “the most important writer you may never have read.” He is something much closer than that. He is the one who carried our tradition up out of the silence the Mankurts were built for. He is my ata, my ancestor. He is the one who still knows my töre on the days I have half-forgotten it.
My grandmother taught me the traditions. Aitmatov wrote them down so I would never lose them.
Further reading:
Chingiz Aitmatov, The White Ship (trans. Mirra Ginsburg)
Chingiz Aitmatov, The Day Lasts More Than a Hundred Years (trans. John French)
Chingiz Aitmatov, The Scaffold (trans. Arch Tait)
Chingiz Aitmatov, Farewell, Gulsary (trans. John French)
Enjoy Reading This Article?
Here are some more articles you might like to read next: